Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siebes, R. C
Right arrow Articles by Gorter, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siebes, R. C
Right arrow Articles by Gorter, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 6, 502-512 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr979oa

Family-centred services in the Netherlands: validating a self-report measure for paediatric service providers

Renate C Siebes

Utrecht University, Langeveld Institute for the Study of Education and Development in Childhood and Adolescence, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Marjolijn Ketelaar

De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation Centre and University Medical Centre, Department of Rehabilitation, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Lex Wijnroks

Utrecht University, Langeveld Institute for the Study of Education and Development in Childhood and Adolescence, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Petra EM van Schie

VU Medical Centre, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Bianca JG Nijhuis

University of Groningen Medical Center, Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands

Adri Vermeer

Utrecht University, Langeveld Institute for the Study of Education and Development in Childhood and Adolescence, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Jan Willem Gorter

De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation Centre and University Medical Centre, Department of Rehabilitation, Rudolf Magnus, Institute of Neuroscience, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Objective: To validate the Dutch translation of the Canadian Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers questionnaire (MPOC-SP) for use in paediatric rehabilitation settings in the Netherlands.

Design: The construct validity, content validity, face validity, and reliability of the Dutch MPOC-SP were determined.

Subjects: The 163 service providers that participated in the validation study represented seven children's rehabilitation centres and affiliated schools in the Netherlands (overall response rate 55.6%). In this sample 19 disciplines were represented.

Main measures: The MPOC-SP consists of 27 items (assessing four domains) and was designed to examine how service providers think about the quality of care they provide and to assess the extent to which these services are family centred. Fifty-three service providers filled out an additional face validity questionnaire.

Results: All items correlated best and significantly with their own scale score (rs 0.48-0.82, P < 0.001). The Pearson's correlation coefficients were all significant and confirmed that the four scales measure different aspects of a same construct, namely family-centred service. The content validity and the face validity of the Dutch MPOC-SP were good, indicating the questionnaire measures relevant aspects of family-centred service delivery in paediatric rehabilitation settings in the Netherlands. The test-retest analyses (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.83-0.89) and the internal consistency analyses (alpha 0.65-0.84) showed that the Dutch MPOC-SP is a reliable tool.

Conclusions: The Dutch MPOC-SP is a reliable and valid instrument to measure the family-centredness of service delivery.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. Siebes, B. Nijhuis, A. Boonstra, M. Ketelaar, L. Wijnroks, H. Reinders-Messelink, K. Postema, and A. Vermeer
A family-specific use of the Measure of Processes of Care for Service Providers (MPOC-SP)
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 242 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
B.J.G. Nijhuis, H.A. Reinders-Messelink, A.C.E. de Blecourt, W.M.G.C. Hitters, J.W. Groothoff, H. Nakken, and K. Postema
Family-centred care in family-specific teams
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 660 - 671.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. C Siebes, G. H Maassen, L. Wijnroks, M. Ketelaar, P. E. van Schie, J. W. Gorter, and A. Vermeer
Quality of paediatric rehabilitation from the parent perspective: validation of the short Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20) in the Netherlands
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 62 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]