This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Whitehead, C. H Articles by Crotty, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Whitehead, C. H Articles by Crotty, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Falls Injuries Wounds Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Attitudes to falls and injury prevention: what are the barriers to implementing falls prevention strategies?

Rachel Wundke

Maria Crotty

Flinders University Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Australia

Objectives: To ascertain the reasons for not taking up a fall or injury prevention strategy among older people who have sustained a fall and attended an emergency department.

Subjects: As part of another trial, we identified 60 people who attended the emergency department of a public hospital with a fall.

Main measures: Participants were interviewed to ascertain the reasons for not taking up a falls prevention strategy, their falls-related health state, and the likelihood of them undertaking a falls and injury prevention strategy.

Results: A total of 31 (52%) of the participants had considered falls prevention after their fall. There were high levels of reluctance to undertake a strategy with 43 (72%) reluctant to take exercise classes, 10 (59%) reluctant to cease psychotropic medications, 26 (43%) reluctant to have a home safety assessment and 17 (28%) reluctant to take osteoporotic medication. When asked specifically about taking up a strategy to prevent a worsening health state, 19 (63%) of participants would take up exercise, 17 (57%) a home safety assessment, 4 of the 17 (59%) already taking implicated medications would stop and 56 (93%) would begin osteoporotic medication. These decisions did not alter when the goal for treatment was to improve a much worse health state. In participants with a lower starting health state, home safety assessments were viewed more favourably.

Conclusions: There were significant obstacles to the implementation of most falls prevention guidelines examined. Treatment for osteoporosis was more acceptable to participants than exercise classes, cessation of psychotropic medication, and having a home safety assessment. Osteoporosis treatment, which had the least resistance, also had the least impact on the participants' lifestyle.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 6, 536-542 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr984oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?