Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gräsel, E
Right arrow Articles by Schupp, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gräsel, E
Right arrow Articles by Schupp, W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 7, 577-583 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr978oa
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Long-term effects of the intensification of the transition between inpatient neurological rehabilitation and home care of stroke patients

E Gräsel

Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Herzogenaurach, Bavaria, Germany

R Schmidt

Clinic for In-and Outpatient Rehabilitation Medicine, Herzogenaurach, Bavaria, Germany

J Biehler

Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Herzogenaurach, Bavaria, Germany

W Schupp

Clinic for In-and Outpatient Rehabilitation Medicine, Herzogenaurach, Bavaria, Germany

Objective: To investigate an intensified transition concept between neurological inpatient rehabilitation and home care for long-term effects on the care situation two and a half years after stroke patients' discharge.

Design: Controlled clinical trial allocating patients to intervention group (intensified transition on ward II) or control group (standard transition on ward I); patients were allocated to whichever ward had a vacancy. The last follow-up assessment was carried out on average 31 months after discharge.

Intervention: The intensified transition concept consisted of therapeutic weekend care, bedside teaching and structured information for relatives during the second phase of the rehabilitation.

Subjects: Seventy-one patients and their family carers were included, of which one case dropped out. Therefore 70 family carers - 35 individuals in each group - were available for assessment at long-term follow-up.

Data collection: Family carers were asked via telephone whether the patient was still alive and if so, where he or she is living - at home or in a nursing home.

Statistical methods: Binary logistic regression analysis with the care situation (home care versus institutionalized care or deceased) as dependent variable.

Results: Two and a half years after discharge (T3) in the intervention group significantly fewer patients were institutionalized (2 versus 5) or deceased (4 versus 11) (P = 0.010). Multivariate analysis showed that besides a higher functional life quality at discharge and lower patient's age, the participation in the intensified transition programme is the third significant predictor for home care at T3.

Conclusion: Effects of an intensified transition programme can persist over a long-term period. They can sustain home care by reducing institutionalization and mortality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?