This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hurn, J. Articles by Cropley, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hurn, J. Articles by Cropley, M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review

Guildford and Waverley NHS Primary Care Trust, Guildford, UK

Ian Kneebone

Guildford and Waverley NHS Primary Care Trust and Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, i.kneebone{at}nhs.net

Mark Cropley

Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

Background: Goal achievement has been considered to be an important measure of outcome by clinicians working with patients in physical and neurological rehabilitation settings. This systematic review was undertaken to examine the reliability, validity and sensitivity of goal setting and goal attainment scaling approaches when used with working age and older people.

Aims and objectives: To review the reliability, validity and sensitivity of both goal setting and goal attainment scaling when employed as an outcome measure within a physical and neurological working age and older person rehabilitation environment, by examining the research literature covering the 36 years since goal-setting theory was proposed.

Methods: Data sources included a computer-aided literature search of published studies examining the reliability, validity and sensitivity of goal setting/goal attainment scaling, with further references sourced from articles obtained through this process.

Main findings: There is strong evidence for the reliability, validity and sensitivity of goal attainment scaling. Empirical support was found for the validity of goal setting but research demonstrating its reliability and sensitivity is limited.

Conclusions: Goal attainment scaling appears to be a sound measure for use in physical rehabilitation settings with working age and older people. Further work needs to be carried out with goal setting to establish its reliability and sensitivity as a measurement tool.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 9, 756-772 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215506070793


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Wade Adverse effects of rehabilitation - an opportunity to increase quality and effectiveness of rehabilitation Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2009; 23(5): 387 - 393. [PDF]

				D. T Wade Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 291 - 295. [PDF]

				L. Scobbie, S. Wyke, and D. Dixon Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 321 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Turner-Stokes Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 362 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. Bovend'Eerdt, R. E Botell, and D. T Wade Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 352 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. F. Bouwens, C. M van Heugten, and F. R. Verhey The practical use of goal attainment scaling for people with acquired brain injury who receive cognitive rehabilitation Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 310 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF]