Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A.M.O.
Right arrow Articles by Koutsi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A.M.O.
Right arrow Articles by Koutsi, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Aphasia
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia

A.M.O. Bakheit

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, magid.bakheit{at}pcs-tr.swest.nhs.uk

S. Shaw

School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Plymouth

L. Barrett

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK

J. Wood

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK

S. Carrington

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK

S. Griffiths

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK

K. Searle

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK

F. Koutsi

Stroke Unit, Mount Gould Hospital, Plymouth, UK

Objective: To examine whether the amount of speech and language therapy influences the recovery from poststroke aphasia.

Setting: A hospital stroke unit and community.

Design: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Intervention: Aphasic stroke patients were randomly allocated to receive 5 hours (intensive therapy group, n=51) or 2 hours (standard therapy group) of speech and language therapy per week for 12 consecutive weeks starting as soon as practicable after the stroke. Another 19 patients were recruited for 2 hours per week of therapy and were treated by National Health Service (NHS) staff (NHS group).

Outcome measure and assessment: The Western Aphasia Battery. Assessments were made blind to randomization at baseline and 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after the start of therapy. Data were analysed by intention to treat.

Results: The mean (SD) Western Aphasia Battery score at week 12 for the intensive, standard and NHS groups was 70.3 (26.9), 66.2 (26.2) and 58.1 (33.7), respectively. There was no treatment effect of intensive therapy (P > 0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference between the standard study and the NHS groups (P = 0.002 at week 12 and 0.01 at week 24).

Conclusions: Intensive speech and language therapy (as delivered in this study) did not improve the language impairment significantly more than the `standard' therapy which averaged 1.6 hours/week. The improvement in aphasia was least in patients who were in the NHS group. These patients received 0.57 (0.49) hours of therapy per week.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 10, 885-894 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507078486


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement