This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bloemen-Vrencken, J.H.A. Articles by van den Heuvel, W.J.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bloemen-Vrencken, J.H.A. Articles by van den Heuvel, W.J.A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Comparison of two Dutch follow-up care models for spinal cord-injured patients and their impact on health problems, re-admissions and quality of care

Rehabilitation Centre Hoensbroeck, Hoensbroek, j.bloemen{at}srl.nl

L.P. de Witte

Institute for Rehabilitation Research, iRv, Hoensbroek, Maastricht University, Maastricht

M.W.M. Post

Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Utrecht

C. Pons

Rehabilitation Centre Hoensbroeck, Hoensbroek

F.W.A. van Asbeck

Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat, Utrecht

L.H.V. van der Woude

Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Centre Amsterdam

W.J.A. van den Heuvel

Institute for Rehabilitation Research, iRv, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Objective: To evaluate whether transmural care for people with spinal cord injury living in the community has more impact on health outcomes than traditional follow-up care within the Netherlands.

Design: Quasi-experiment with 12 months of follow-up.

Setting: Eight Dutch rehabilitation centres.

Subjects: Thirty-one patients who received transmural care in two `experimental' rehabilitation centres were compared with a matched sample of 31 patients having received `usual follow-up care' in six other rehabilitation centres.

Intervention: The core component of the transmural care consists of a transmural nurse, who `liaises' between former patients living in the community, primary care professionals and the rehabilitation team. The transmural care model provides activities to support patients and their family/partners and activities to promote continuity of care.

Main measures: The prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections; the number and duration of re-admissions to hospital and rehabilitation centre due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems; and the experienced quality of follow-up care.

Results: The transmural care, as implemented, did not influence the health outcomes. The prevalence of pressure sores, urinary tract infections and the number of re-admissions (due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems) was respectively 13, 13 and 4 in the intervention group versus 14, 15 and 6 in the usual follow-up care group. Since the transmural care had been incompletely implemented and there were methodological and practical limitations, we formulated no final conclusions regarding its effectiveness.

Conclusion: Implementing the transmural care model strictly according to protocol may improve its effectiveness.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?