| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0269215506070783 Participation and drop-out in pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis of the patient's perspective
Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Rijnlands Rehabilitation Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Nies Schoondonck Rehabilitation Centre, Breda, The Netherlands
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Thomas Guy House, London, UK
Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands Objective: To examine patients' pretreatment beliefs and goals regarding pulmonary rehabilitation. Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Setting: Interviews conducted at participants' homes. Subjects: Twelve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had been referred to a rehabilitation clinic. Main measures: Patients' beliefs about pulmonary rehabilitation, self-set treatment goals and anticipated reasons for drop-out. Results: Patients' beliefs about pulmonary rehabilitation comprised positive aspects (participation as an opportunity for improvement, a safe and multidisciplinary setting, presence of motivating and supporting patients) and negative aspects of exercising in a rehabilitation centre (e.g. disruption of normal routine, being tired after training, transportation difficulties, limited privacy and confrontation with severely ill patients). Four types of treatment goals were formulated: increase in functional performance, weight regulation, reduction of dyspnoea, and improvement of psychosocial well being. Four clusters of anticipated reasons for drop-out were identified: the intensity of the programme, barriers to attending (e.g. transportation problems, sudden illness and other duties/responsibilities), lack of improvement and social factors. Four different attitudes towards pulmonary rehabilitation could be distinguished: optimistic, wait and see, sceptic and pessimistic. Follow-up data revealed that whereas a pessimistic attitude (high disability, low self-confidence, many concerns) was related to decline, the sceptic patients had dropped out during the course. Conclusions: Uptake and drop-out may be related to patients' perceived disabilities, expected benefits and concerns with regard to rehabilitation, practical barriers and confidence in their own capabilities.
|