Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langhammer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Stanghelle, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langhammer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Stanghelle, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 6, 495-510 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507075207
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Stroke patients and long-term training: is it worthwhile? A randomized comparison of two different training strategies after rehabilitation

Birgitta Langhammer

Oslo University College, Faculty of Health, Physiotherapy Programme, Oslo, Norway, Birgitta.Langhammer{at}hf.hio.no

Birgitta Lindmark

Uppsala University, Department of Neuroscience, Section of Physiotherapy, Uppsala, Sweden

Johan K. Stanghelle

Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway

Objective : To find out if there were any differences in improvement and maintenance of motor function, activity of daily living and grip strength between patients with first-ever stroke receiving two different strategies of physical exercise during the first year after stroke.

Design : A longitudinal randomized controlled stratified trial.

Setting : Rehabilitation institutions, community, patients' homes and nursing homes.

Subjects : Seventy-five male and female first-time-ever stroke patients: 35 in an intensive exercise group and 40 in a regular exercise group.

Intervention : The intensive exercise group received physiotherapy with focus on intensive exercises in four periods during the first year after stroke. The regular exercise group patients were followed up according to their subjective needs during the corresponding year.

Main outcome measures : Motor Assessment Scale, Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living, and grip strength.

Results : Both groups improved significantly up to six months when function stabilized. The groups did not differ significantly on any test occasions. The difference of improvement from admission to discharge was significant in favour of the intensive exercise group, in the Motor Assessment Scale total score (intensive exercise group 7.5; regular exercise group 1.7, P = 0.01), and in the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living total score (17.4 versus 8.9, P = 0.04).

Conclusion : Motor function, activities of daily living functions and grip strength improved initially and were maintained during the first year after stroke in all patients irrespective of exercise regime. This indicates the importance of motivation for regular exercise in the first year following stroke, achieved by regular check-ups.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?