This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lemmens, J. Articles by de Witte, L. P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lemmens, J. Articles by de Witte, L. P Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch Life Habits Questionnaire (LIFE-H 3.0) in older adults

Department of Speech Therapy, je.lemmens{at}hszuyd.n

Eveline ISM van Engelen

Department of Physical Therapy, Centre of Expertise on Autonomy and Participation, Zuyd University, Heerlen

Marcel WM Post

Rehabilitation Centre —de Hoogstraat-, Utrecht

Luc P de Witte

Centre of Expertise on Autonomy and Participation and Centre of Expertise on Autonomy and Participation, Zuyd University, Heerlen, The Netherlands

AJHM Beurskens

Department of Physical Therapy, Centre of Expertise on Autonomy and Participation

Pieter MJC Wolters

Department of Physical Therapy, Centre of Expertise on Autonomy and Participation

Luc P de Witte

Centre of Expertise on Autonomy and Participation and Centre of Expertise on Autonomy and Participation, Zuyd University, Heerlen, The Netherlands

Objective: To examine the reproducibility, the discriminant and convergent validity and feasibility of the Dutch translation of the self-administered Life Habits Questionnaire (LIFE-H).

Design: Three cross-sectional community-based studies on clinimetric properties of a measurement instrument.

Subjects: Older adults (n = 85) with functional limitations due to various chronic illnesses and healthy older adults (n = 40).

Measurement protocol: Participants of the reproducibility study (n = 35) filled out the LIFE-H twice in a two-week time period. In the discriminant validity study (n = 120), LIFE-H scores of healthy and ill subjects were compared. In the convergent validity study (n = 63), correlations were examined between LIFE-H, the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire and the London Handicap Scale.

Results: The test—retest reliability showed a satisfactory intraclass correlation coefficient for the total overall score (0.80) but not for the categories scores. The discriminant validity study showed significant differences between the healthy and ill subjects for the 10 separate categories (P < 0.01) and the total score (P < 0.001). The correlations between the LIFE-H categories and total scores and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (0.80—0.82) and London Handicap Scale (0.89—0.92) were strong. Feasibility testing showed that the subjects experienced difficulties due to the long and fairly complex instructions and structure of the LIFE-H.

Conclusions: The clinimetric properties of the LIFE-H were moderate to good. The validity of LIFE-H was as good as the validity of the Impact on Autonomy and Participation and the London Handicap Scale, but the latter questionnaires were shorter and much easier to administer.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 9, 853-862 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507077599


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?