This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by de Bruin, E. D Articles by Zijlstra, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by de Bruin, E. D Articles by Zijlstra, W. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Wearable systems for monitoring mobility-related activities in older people: a systematic review

Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, D-Biology, ETH Zurich, debruin{at}move.biol.ethz.ch, Department of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich

Antonia Hartmann

Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, D-Biology, ETH Zurich

Daniel Uebelhart

Department of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich

Kurt Murer

Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, D-Biology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland and

Wiebren Zijlstra

Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Objective: The use of wearable motion-sensing technology offers important advantages over conventional methods for obtaining measures of physical activity and/or physical functioning in aged individuals. This review aims to identify the actual state of applying wearable systems for monitoring mobility-related activity in older populations. In this review we focus on technologies and applications, research designs, feasibility and adherence aspects, and clinical relevance of wearable motion-sensing technology.

Data sources: PubMed (MEDLINE since 1990), Ovid (BIOSIS, CINAHL), and Cochrane (Central) and reference lists of all relevant articles were searched.

Review methods: Two authors independently reviewed randomized and non-randomized trials on people above 65 years systematically. Quality of selected articles was scored and study results were summarised and discussed.

Results: Two hundred and twenty-seven abstracts were considered. After application of inclusion criteria and full text reading, 42 articles were taken into account in a full text review. Twenty of these papers evaluated walking with step counters, other papers used varying accelerometry approaches for obtaining overall activity measures (n = 16), or for monitoring changes in body postures and activity patterns (n = 17). Seven studies explicitly mentioned feasibility and/or adherence aspects. Eight studies presented outcome evaluations of interventions. Eight articles were representing descriptive research designs, three articles were using mixed descriptive and exploratory research designs, 23 articles used exploratory research-type designs, and eight articles used experimental research designs.

Conclusion: Although feasible methods for monitoring human mobility are available, evidence-based clinical applications of these methods in older populations are in need of further development.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 10-11, 878-895 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508090675


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Dawes Editorial Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2008; 22(10-11): 867 - 870. [PDF]