This Article Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gok, H. Articles by Dincer, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gok, H. Articles by Dincer, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Rehabilitation Stroke Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Efficacy of treatment with a kinaesthetic ability training device on balance and mobility after stroke: a randomized controlled study

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara

D. Geler-Kulcu

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Yeditepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, d_geler{at}yeditepe.edu.tr

N. Alptekin

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Yasam Medical Center, Kirikkale

G. Dincer

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Objective: To investigate whether the addition of a kinaesthetic ability training device could enhance the effect of a conventional rehabilitation programme on balance and mobility in hemiparetic patients late after stroke.

Design: Randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial.

Setting: The rehabilitation ward of a university hospital. Thirty hemiparetic patients (mean age (SD) of 57.4 (8.1) years) late after stroke (mean time since stroke (SD) 545.2 (99.9) days) were assigned randomly to an experimental or a control group.

Interventions: The control group (n = 15) participated in a conventional rehabilitation programme. The experimental group (n = 15) participated in balance training with a kinaesthetic ability training device in addition to a conventional rehabilitation programme for four weeks, five days a week.

Outcome measures: Kinaesthetic ability training static and dynamic balance indices, balance and lower extremity subscores of the Fugl-Meyer Stroke Assessment Instrument (FMA), total motor and locomotor subitem scores of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were evaluated at baseline and after treatment.

Results: The experimental group had greater improvement in measures of balance including static (P = 0.045) and dynamic balance index (P = 0.001) and FMA balance score (P = 0.001) than the control group. No between-group differences were detected in subscore of FMA, total motor and locomotor subscores of FIM. There were significant improvements in balance subscores of FMA, static and dynamic balance indexes in the experimental group and in sub-item scores of FIM and lower extremity scores of FMA in both groups.

Conclusion: Kinaesthetic ability training in addition to a conventional rehabilitation programme is effective in improving balance late after stroke. However, this improvement is not reflected in individual functional status.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 10-11, 922-930 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508090673


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Dawes Editorial Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2008; 22(10-11): 867 - 870. [PDF]