SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Newby, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, J.
Right arrow Articles by Newby, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Capacity to make a decision about discharge destination after stroke: a pilot study

JA Mackenzie

Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, janice.mackenzie{at}nhs.net

NB Lincoln

University of Nottingham

GJ Newby

Western Cheshire PCT

Objective: To investigate the effect of cognitive problems and other factors on the capacity to make a decision about discharge destination and to compare the impressions of multidisciplinary team (MDT) members regarding capacity with a formal assessment.

Design: Between-subjects comparison design.

Setting: One stroke rehabilitation unit.

Subjects: Thirty-four stroke patients.

Procedure: For six months, all patients admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit were asked to take part after one week and assessed on the outcome measures.

Main outcome measures: The multidisciplinary team completed questionnaires regarding risk, capacity and referral plans. All participants had a cognitive assessment. Capacity was assessed blind to the results of the cognitive assessment and independently rated by another assessor. Clinical and demographic information were collated.

Results: No significant association was found between cognitive functioning and capacity (P>0.05). Age, weeks post-stroke, Barthel and dysphasia were not significantly associated with capacity (P>0.05). Multidisciplinary team members were often unsure about the capacity of people to make decisions. Inter-rater reliability for the capacity assessment was reasonable (72%; P=0.06).

Conclusions: The preliminary conclusions are that cognitive test scores, age and dysphasia are not good predictors of capacity to decide about discharge destination in stroke patients receiving rehabilitation. Impressions of capacity should not be used to determine the need for a formal capacity assessment.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 12, 1116-1126 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508096175


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement