This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gremeaux, V. Articles by Casillas, J.-M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gremeaux, V. Articles by Casillas, J.-M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparative analysis of oxygen uptake in elderly subjects performing two walk tests: the six-minute walk test and the 200-m fast walk test

Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital Dijon and INSERM-U887, Dijon, vincent.gremeaux{at}chu_dijon.fr

Marwan Iskandar

INSERM-U887, Dijon, Dominic Pérénnou

Gaëlle Kervio

INSERM-U887, Dijon, Dominic Pérénnou

Gaëlle Deley

INSERM-U887, Dijon, Dominic Pérénnou

Dominic Pérénnou

Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital Dijon and INSERM-U887, Dijon, France

Jean-Marie Casillas

Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital Dijon and INSERM-U887, Dijon, France

Objective: A novel walk test is proposed to assess the ability of elderly subjects to sustain a submaximal effort in ecological surroundings. Vo₂ uptake during this test was compared with that of a six-minute walk test and maximal exercise test.

Design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Setting: Rehabilitation department, Dijon University Hospital.

Subjects: Thirty-one subjects, aged from 70 to 85 years, free from any chronic disease.

Intervention: Three tests to assess physical capacities: the 200-m fast walk test (200 mFWT), the six-minute walk test (6 MWT) at self-paced speed, and one maximal cardiorespiratory exercise test on an ergocycle.

Main measures: Distance walked on the 6 MWT, time to perform the 200 mFWT. Heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (Vo₂) were measured for each test.

Results: All subjects successfully completed the two walk tests without any complaints. They walked more quickly during the 200 mFWT than during the 6 MWT (mean (SD) speed respectively 1.60 (0.17) versus 1.23 (0.16) m/s, P<0.001). Compared with the maximal exercise test, the relative intensity was much higher during the 200 mFWT than during the 6 MWT (mean (SD) Vo₂ uptake 86.8 (8.9)% versus 67.4 (10.7)% of peak Vo₂, mean (SD) HR 89.9 (9.4) versus 76.2 (0.8)% of peak HR; P<0.001).

Conclusion: In healthy elderly subjects, the 200 mFWT requires a more sustained effort than the 6 MWT. This test is simple, ecological and well tolerated. In addition to the 6 MWT, the 200 mFWT could be a useful tool to build up and evaluate training or rehabilitation programmes, especially when interval training is planned

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 2, 162-168 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507080125


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?