Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherall, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherall, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 6, 556-563 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507085378

Mobility beyond the clinic: the effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors

Kimberley Donovan

School of Physiotherapy, Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, kim.donovan{at}otago.ac.nz

Susan E Lord

Department of Medicine (Rehabilitation) Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago

Harry K McNaughton

Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington

Mark Weatherall

Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand

Objective: To explore the impact of a complex community environment on gait parameters (speed, step length and cadence) for community-dwelling participants with a previous stroke, and compare outcome measures commonly used in a clinical environment.

Design: Repeated measurement of participants in different environments.

Setting: One clinic and two community environments (suburban street and shopping mall).

Subjects: Thirty community-dwelling stroke participants with chronic stroke who were classified according to gait speed (20—50 m/min on 10-metre timed walk) as marginal community walkers.

Outcome measures: During a six-minute walk test (6MWT) a step activity monitor (SAM) and odometer were used to calculate gait speed, step length and cadence. The 10-metre timed walk (10MTW) was measured in a clinic environment.

Analysis: A mixed linear model examined differences in gait measurements in the different environments. Bland—Altman analysis illustrated agreement between gait speed measures (6MWT and 10MTW).

Results: A statistically significant, but not a clinically significant difference in gait speed between some environments was found. Gait speed was slowest in the mall and fastest in the street with a difference of only 2.1 m/min between these environments (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.8 to -0.5, P<0.01). Comparison of clinic 10MTW and street 6MWT showed wide limits of agreement (-18.5 to 16.9 m/min) which improved for clinic 6MWT and street 6MWT comparisons (-5.7 to 8.9 m/min).

Conclusion: Despite residual gait deficit, the gait parameters of these chronic stroke survivors did not deteriorate markedly under challenging conditions. The 6MWT is recommended as a clinical measure for community ambulation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?