This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cook, S. Articles by Coleman, J. H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cook, S. Articles by Coleman, J. H Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Occupational therapy for people with psychotic conditions in community settings: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University,s.p.cook{at}shu.ac.uk

Eleni Chambers

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield

Julie H Coleman

Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of a long established intervention, occupational therapy for people with psychotic conditions, and to inform future research designs.

Design: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Two community mental health teams in a UK city.

Participants: Forty-four adults with schizophrenia or other psychotic conditions, and functional problems.

Interventions: Twelve months of individualized occupational therapy in community settings, as an adjunct to usual care and compared to treatment as usual. A two to one randomization ratio was used in favour of occupational therapy.

Outcome measures: Social Functioning Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms and employment.

Results: Both groups' scores on Social Functioning Scale and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms showed significant improvement over 12 months. The Social Functioning Scale overall mean difference for occupational therapy was 2.33, P=0.020 and for treatment as usual was 6.17, P=0.023. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms total mean difference for occupational therapy was -16.25, P<0.001 and for treatment as usual was -17.36, P= 0.011. There were no differences between the two groups on any of the outcome measures. After 12 months the occupational therapy group showed clinically significant improvements that were not apparent in the control group. These were in four subscales of the Social Functioning Scale: relationships, independence performance, independence competence and recreation. Out of 30 people receiving occupational therapy those with a clinical level of negative symptoms reduced from 18 (64%) to 13 (46%), P=0.055.

Conclusion: This pilot study suggested that individualized occupational therapy may contribute to recovery but more focus is recommended on people's cognitive abilities and employment.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 1, 40-52 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508098898


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?