This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cochrane review: information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers

Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK, jane.smith{at}bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk

Anne Forster

Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK

John Young

Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, UK

On behalf of the Cochrane Group for information provision after stroke

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of information provision strategies in improving the outcome for stroke patients and/or their identified caregivers.

Data sources: We searched: the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; electronic databases MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; PsycINFO; Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index; Assia; Index to UK theses; Dissertation Abstracts; ongoing trials and research registers; bibliographies of retrieved papers, relevant articles, and books; the Journal of Advanced Nursing. We also contacted researchers for additional information.

Review methods: Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Primary outcomes were knowledge about stroke and impact on mood. Meta-analyses were undertaken for the domains of knowledge, mood, satisfaction, and mortality.

Results: Seventeen trials were identified and 11 contributed data to the meta-analyses. There were significant effects in favour of the intervention on patient knowledge (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 0.46), caregiver knowledge (SMD 0.74 95% CI 0.06 to 1.43), patient depression scores (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.52, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.10), and one aspect of patient satisfaction (odds ratio (OR) 2.07, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.23). Post-hoc subgroup analyses showed that strategies which actively involved patient and caregivers had a significantly greater effect on patient anxiety (P<0.05) and depression (P<0.02) than passive strategies.

Conclusion: There is some evidence to support the routine provision of information to stroke patients and their families. Although the best way to provide information is still not clear, the results of this review suggest that strategies which actively involve patients and caregivers should be used in routine practice.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 3, 195-206 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508092820


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?