This Article Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material A correction has been published All Versions of this Article: 0269215508101742v1 23/4/362    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Turner-Stokes, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Turner-Stokes, L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide

Kings college London, School of Medicine, Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK, lynne.turner-stokes{at}dial.pipex.com

Goal attainment scaling is a mathematical technique for quantifying the achievement (or otherwise) of goals set, and it can be used in rehabilitation. Because several different approaches are described in the literature, this article presents a simple practical approach to encourage uniformity in its application. It outlines the process of setting goals appropriately, so that the achievement of each goal can be measured on a 5-point scale ranging from -2 to +2, and then explains a method for quantifying the outcome in a single aggregated goal attainment score. This method gives a numerical T-score which is normally distributed about a mean of 50 (if the goals are achieved precisely) with a standard deviation of around this mean of 10 (if the goals are overachieved or underachieved). If desired, the approach encompasses weighting of goals to reflect the opinion of the patient on the personal importance of the goal and the opinion of the therapist or team on the difficulty of achieving the goal. Some practical tips are offered, as well as a simple spreadsheet (in Microsoft Excel) allowing easy calculation of the T-scores.

This version was published on April 1, 2009

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 4, 362-370 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508101742


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Turner-Stokes and H. Williams Goal attainment scaling: a direct comparison of alternative rating methods Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2010; 24(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. T Wade Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 291 - 295. [PDF]

				E D. Playford, R. Siegert, W. Levack, and J. Freeman Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 334 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. Bovend'Eerdt, R. E Botell, and D. T Wade Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 352 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]