This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269215508101733v1 23/6/492    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ross, L. F Articles by Lannin, N. A PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ross, L. F Articles by Lannin, N. A Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do people with acquired brain impairment benefit from additional therapy specifically directed at the hand? A randomized controlled trial

Ipswich Hospital, Brisbane

Lisa A Harvey

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, l.harvey{at}usyd.edu.au

Natasha A Lannin

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia

Objective: To determine the benefits of additional therapy specifically directed at the hand in people with acquired brain impairment.

Design: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Rehabilitation hospital.

Participants: A sample of 39 adults with hand impairment following stroke (90%) or traumatic brain injury (10%). The median (interquartile) time since injury was 1.6 months (0.5—3.5 months).

Intervention: The experimental group (n = 20) received an additional one-hour session of task-specific motor training for the hand five times a week over a six-week period. The training was administered on a one-to-one basis. The control group (n = 19) received standard care which consisted of 10 minutes of hand therapy three times a week. Both groups continued to receive therapy directed at the shoulder and elbow.

Outcome measures: Primary outcomes were the Action Research Arm and Summed Manual Muscle Tests measured at the beginning and end of the six-week period.

Results: The mean (SD) Action Research Arm Test values for experimental participants improved from the beginning to the end of study from 10 points (15) to 21 points (23) and the equivalent values for the Summed Manual Muscle Test improved from 35% (33) to 49% (35). There were similar improvements in control participants. The mean between-group differences for the Action Research Arm and Summed Manual Muscle Tests were -6 points (95% confidence interval (CI), -20 to 8) and 3% (95% CI, -10 to 16), respectively.

Conclusion: Hand and overall arm function of all participants improved over the six-week period, however there was not a clear benefit from providing additional hand therapy.

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 6, 492-503 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508101733


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?