This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269215509334841v1 23/8/681    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Borisova, Y. Articles by Bohannon, R. W PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Borisova, Y. Articles by Bohannon, R. W Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Positioning to prevent or reduce shoulder range of motion impairments after stroke: a meta-analysis

Department of Physical Therapy, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs

Richard W Bohannon

Department of Physical Therapy, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs and Physical Therapy Consultants, West Hartford, Connecticut, USA, ptconsultant{at}comcast.net

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of positioning on range of motion of the paretic shoulder following stroke.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, PEDro, Cochrane Controlled Trails Register and article reference lists.

Review methods: Randomized controlled trials reporting range of motion outcomes of shoulder positioning programmes for patients with stroke were examined independently by the two authors. Studies reporting external rotation range of motion outcomes were abstracted and their quality was rated.

Results: Five studies, all published in 2000 or later, were included. Shoulder external rotation range of motion was lost by control groups (mean = 11.0—18.4^°) and experimental (positioning) groups (mean = 6.1^° to 19.2 ^°) in every study.

The standardized mean difference between groups was -0.216 (95% confidence interval -0.573 to 0.141). These findings and the demonstration of homogeneity between and within groups do not support positioning (as practised) as an effective intervention for preventing or slowing the development of range-of-motion impairments of the paretic shoulder after stroke.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis failed to support the benefit of positioning the paretic upper extremity to prevent or reduce shoulder external rotation range of motion impairments after stroke.

This version was published on August 1, 2009

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 8, 681-686 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509334841


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?