This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269215509104171v1 23/8/696    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Glinsky, J. Articles by Gandevia, S. C PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Glinsky, J. Articles by Gandevia, S. C Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The addition of electrical stimulation to progressive resistance training does not enhance the wrist strength of people with tetraplegia: a randomized controlled trial

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, J.Glinsky{at}usyd.edu.au

Lisa Harvey

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Pauline van Es

School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Shane Chee

Department of Physiotherapy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney

Simon C Gandevia

Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Sydney, Australia

Objective: To determine whether the addition of electrical stimulation to progressive resistance training increases the voluntary strength of the wrist muscles in people with tetraplegia.

Design: Assessor-blind within-subject randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Two Australian spinal cord injury units and the community.

Participants: Sixty-four wrists of 32 people with tetraplegia and bilateral weakness of the wrist extensor or flexor muscles (grade 2 - 4 Medical Research Council grades).

Interventions: Participants' wrists were randomly allocated to one of two conditions. Wrist muscles of the experimental arm received electrical stimulation superimposed on progressive resistance training. The wrist muscles of the contralateral arm received sham electrical stimulation superimposed on progressive resistance training. Both arms received 6 sets of 10 contractions three times a week for eight weeks such that the only difference between arms was the application of electrical stimulation.

Main Measures: The primary outcome was maximal voluntary isometric strength. Secondary outcomes were a fatigue resistance ratio representing voluntary and electrically-stimulated endurance. Measurements were taken at the start and end of the eight-week treatment period.

Results: The mean treatment effect (95% Confidence Interval) of electrical stimulation for voluntary strength was 0.04 Nm (95% CI, -0.5 to 0.6; p =0.89). The mean treatment effect (95% CI) for fatigue ratio representing voluntary endurance and electrically-stimulated endurance was -0.01 (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.1; p =0.78) and -0.07 (95% CI, -0.3 to 0.1; p =0.47), respectively.

Conclusions: Voluntary strength of the wrist is not enhanced by the addition of electrical stimulation to progressive resistance training programs in people with tetraplegia.

This version was published on August 1, 2009

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 8, 696-704 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509104171


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?