This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269215509335018v1 23/9/824    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tyson, S. Articles by Connell, L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tyson, S. Articles by Connell, L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How to measure balance in clinical practice. A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions

Centre for Rehabilitation and Human Performance Research, University of Salford, s.tyson{at}salford.ac.uk

LA Connell

Department of Physiotherapy Education, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Nottingham, on behalf of the Greater Manchester Outcome Measures project steering group, UK

Objective: To identify psychometrically robust and clinically feasible measurement tools of balance activity in people with neurological conditions to recommend for use in clinical practice.

Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and AMED.

Review methods: Independent reviewers selected and extracted data from articles that assessed the reliability, validity, sensitivity to change and clinical utility of measures of balance activity in adult neurological conditions. Quality assessment was based on Jorstad et al. Measures with ‘good' psychometrics and 9/10 clinical utility scores were recommended.

Results: Nineteen measurement tools were selected. Of these, the Brunel Balance Assessment, Berg Balance Scale, Trunk Impairment Scale, arm raise and forward reach tests in sitting and standing, weight shift, step/tap and step-up tests reached the required standards and are usable in clinical practice. The Brunel Balance Assessment and its associated functional performance tests have the additional advantages of being a hierarchical scale with established lack of redundancy.

Conclusion: The measurement tools identified above are psychometrically robust and feasible to use in clinical practice. Future objective measure development should consider the theoretical construct of the measure, the minimal detectable change and use in clinical populations other than stroke.

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 9, 824-840 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509335018


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?