This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269215509102949v1 23/9/841    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bagley, P. Articles by Young, J. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bagley, P. Articles by Young, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do physiotherapy staff record treatment time accurately? An observational study

Division of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, p.j.bagley{at}bradford.ac.uk

Mary Hudson

Physiotherapy Department, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary

John Green

Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK

Anne Forster

Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK

John Young

Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Temple Bank House, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK

Objective: To assess the reliability of duration of treatment time measured by physiotherapy staff in early-stage stroke patients.

Design: Comparison of physiotherapy staff’s recording of treatment sessions and video recording.

Setting: Rehabilitation stroke unit in a general hospital.

Subjects: Thirty-nine stroke patients without trunk control or who were unable to stand with an erect trunk without the support of two therapists recruited to a randomized trial evaluating the Oswestry Standing Frame. Twenty-six physiotherapy staff who were involved in patient treatment.

Main measures: Contemporaneous recording by physiotherapy staff of treatment time (in minutes) compared with video recording.

Statistical analysis: Intraclass correlation with 95% confidence interval and the Bland and Altman method for assessing agreement by calculating the mean difference (standard deviation; 95% confidence interval), reliability coefficient and 95% limits of agreement for the differences between the measurements.

Results: The mean duration (standard deviation, SD) of treatment time recorded by physiotherapy staff was 32 (11) minutes compared with 25 (9) minutes as evidenced in the video recording. The mean difference (SD) was —6 (9) minutes (95% confidence interval (CI) —9 to —3). The reliability coefficient was 18 minutes and the 95% limits of agreement were —24 to 12 minutes. Intraclass correlation coefficient for agreement between the two methods was 0.50 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.73).

Conclusions: Physiotherapy staff’s recording of duration of treatment time was not reliable and was systematically greater than the video recording.

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 9, 841-845 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509102949


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?