SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Powell, G. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Powell, G. E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Insight and progress in rehabilitation

Camilla M Herbert

Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford

Graham E Powell

Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford

The literature on the effect of insight on rehabilitation success is reviewed. Its role as a possible motivating factor is considered in the context of the development of the concept of motivation. The difficulties of research in this field are discussed. The aim of the present study is stated as an attempt to clarify the effect of insight on rehabilitation success by exploring the relationship between insight and motivation. In this study accuracy of insight was not found to be related to rehabilitation success. Clients who overrated their abilities, i.e., were optimistic, did better than the underconfident or pessimistic clients. Optimistic clients were more highly motivated in that they saw scope for improvements and were sure of achieving these gains without too much effort. Previous studies are reexamined in the light of these findings and possible explanations for the discrepant results are presented.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 125-130 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558900300207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
K. B Malia, S. Torode, and G. E Powell
Insight and progress in rehabilitation after brain injury
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1993; 7(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement