Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kettle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kettle, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The stroke patient in an urban environment

Melvyn Kettle

School of Medicine, University of Leeds

M Anne Chamberlain

School of Medicine, University of Leeds

A cohort of 70 patients who had had a stroke a median of 19 months, for males, and 23 months, for females, beforehand and had been treated intensively in a rehabilitation unit, was compared with an age matched control group (25) of normal people living in the same city.

Two thirds of patients were moderately or severely limited in their independence on the Barthel Scale; only4% had a normal level of social activities (Frenchay Index) and half were depressed (Wakefield Scale). Mobility was severely impaired, only 15% being able to walk more than 440 yards. Only one subject drove a car, few could use public transport, and only two people returned to work full time. Use of health services and social services was low. No control subjects had any such problems. Therefore, the social effects of stroke are severe; they persist for many years and they are not addressed by current inpatient treatment. New models of treatment must be devised and evaluated to reduce social isolation and depression in the patient and carer.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 131-138 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558900300208


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. B Young and A. Forster
The Bradford community stroke trial: eight week results
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1991; 5(4): 283 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Young and A. Forster
Methodology of a stroke rehabilitation trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1991; 5(2): 127 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement