This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mutch, W. Articles by Oxtoby, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mutch, W. Articles by Oxtoby, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A pilot study of patient rated disability and the need for aids in Parkinson's disease

Ninewells Hospital, Dundee

MW Swallow

Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast

M. Baker

Parkinson's Disease Society, London

J. Beazley

Parkinson's Disease Society, London

M. Oxtoby

Parkinson's Disease Society, London

In a questionnaire survey 71/96 members of the Belfast branch of the Parkinson's Disease Society reported their use of existing aids and their need for new aids. They selfrated their disability over a wide range of day-to-day functions, including transferring and turning in bed, selfcare, general mobility, independent living and communication.

Thirty-one people had a particularly helpful aid. Only 16 people mentioned problems where a new aid might be helpful, but a number of these were already available. Comments were in general not about aids but rather the need for therapy, problems with drugs and the variability of the disease. Large numbers of patients were dependent in many daily tasks including 55% and 44% respectively needing help to bathe and dress. 31 % were dependent walking indoors and 73% could not use public transport by themselves.

Clues to both the usefulness and limitations of aids were provided and require further exploration. There is a need for an overall support strategy in which expert assessment of daily living tasks and the provision of appropriate aids can play an important part. Doctors, therapists and patients all require more information on these topics.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 151-155 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558900300211


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Ballinger, R. Pickering, S. Bannister, S. Gore, and D. McLellan Evaluating equipment for people with disabilities: user and technical perspectives on basic commodes Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1995; 9(2): 157 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]