SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.
Right arrow Articles by Edmans, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.
Right arrow Articles by Edmans, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A shortened version of the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery?

NB Lincoln

Stroke Research Unit, General Hospital, Nottingham

JA Edmans

Stroke Research Unit, General Hospital, Nottingham

The aim was to investigate whether the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery could be shortened. The relationships between subtest scores were examined and three short versions were developed by different methods. Comparison of these indicated no clear overall advantage of any one method. It is suggested that any of the three shortened versions are acceptable for clinical use.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 3, No. 3, 199-204 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558900300303
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
G. Prada and R. Tallis
Treatment of the neglect syndrome in stroke patients using a contingency electrical stimulator
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1995; 9(4): 304 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
R. Sloan, C. Downie, J. Hornby, and B. Pentland
Routine screening of brain-damaged patients: a comparison of the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery and the Chessington Occupational Therapy Neurological Assessment Battery
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1991; 5(4): 265 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
J. Edmans, D. Towle, and N. Lincoln
The recovery of perceptual problems after stroke and the impact on daily life
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1991; 5(4): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
H. J Jesshope, M. S Clark, and D. S Smith
The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery: its application to stroke patients and relationship with function
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1991; 5(2): 115 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Advertisement