This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cramond, H. J Articles by Smith, D. S Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cramond, H. J Articles by Smith, D. S Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The effect of using the dominant or nondominant hand on performance of the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Repatriation General Hospital, The Flinders University of South Australia

Michael S Clark

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Repatriation General Hospital, The Flinders University of South Australia

Dennis S Smith

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Repatriation General Hospital, The Flinders University of South Australia

The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery (RPAB) claims to be a standardized and validated test of visual perception. However, the published evidence suggests that several areas have not been considered by the authors of the test. One of these is whether the dominant or nondominant hand is used, particularly for those aspects of the test which require either pencil skills or the fine manipulation of objects. The purpose of this study was to conduct subtests of the RPAB on a group drawn from a nonclinical population to determine whether or not there are differences in performance between the dominant and nondominant hand. The study involved 35 first year university students who were right-hand dominant for writing. Each subject completed the four subtests twice, once with the right hand and once with the left. Statistically significant differences were found between right and left hand performance in both the score achieved and the time taken for right left copying shapes (RLCS) and right left copying words (RLCW), tests 11 and 12, and for time alone in cancellation (CA), test 15. No significant differences were found in 3D copying (test 13). Test 12 is of particular concern, as 24 subjects failed this test when using their nondominant hand. These findings have implications for the interpretation of test results when the RPAB is administered to stroke patients who, due to the nature and site of their lesions, may be forced to use the nondominant hand.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 3, No. 3, 215-221 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558900300306


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. J Jesshope, M. S Clark, and D. S Smith The Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery: its application to stroke patients and relationship with function Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1991; 5(2): 115 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]