SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Improving recall of health service information

Barbara Wilson

University Rehabilitation Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton

A group of health service professionals was asked to listen to tape recorded summaries of four health related problems (memory impairment, visual object agnosia, unilateral visual neglect and behaviour disorder). Each summary was presented in one of the following ways: 1) using professional terms and jargon; 2) using simplified language; 3) categorizing the material; 4) combining simplified language and categorization. The order of presentation was counterbalanced across subjects.

Following a distractor task, each subject was asked to write down as much as he or she could remember. Results were scored 'blind'. The use of professional terms and jargon resulted in significantly poorer recall than the other methods. Simplification and categorization were not significantly different from each other in terms of the amount of information recalled. The combined method was superior to all other methods. It is hoped that this study will enable health workers to recognize the importance of presenting information in a simplified and structured manner.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 3, No. 4, 275-279 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558900300402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement