SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sunderland, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sunderland, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Arm activity i n everyday life after stroke: measu rement using modified automatic-wind wrist watches ('actometers')

A. Sunderland

Neurological/Stroke Rehabilitation Unit, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol

DJ Tinson

Neurological/Stroke Rehabilitation Unit, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol

EL Bradley

Neurological/Stroke Rehabilitation Unit, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol

This study investigates the validity of actometers as a method of monitoring arm movement in everyday life after stroke. Ten stroke patients with impaired arm function and 10 normal people of similar age wore actometers on each wrist for up to 10 hours on two separate days. The actometers successfully detected reduced average activity of the affected arm after stroke. They also gave higher average readings for the dominant arm of normal subjects when compared to the nondominant side. However, there were suggestions of limits to the validity of the actometers: not every stroke patient or normal subject produced the expected results; test-retest reliability was only moderate; and stroke patients showed only a weak relationship between actometer readings and performance on arm function tests. The low cost and unobtrusiveness of actometers means that despite limitations on their validity, actometers may be a valuable tool in rehabilitation therapy.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 19-25 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559000400104
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement