SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fullerton, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fullerton, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The value of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test in screening for dysphasia: better than the clinician?

PA O'Neill

University Hospital of South Manchester

B. Cheadle

University Hospital of South Manchester

R. Wyatt

University Hospital of South Manchester

J. McGuffog

University Hospital of South Manchester

KJ Fullerton

University Hospital of South Manchester

We have evaluated the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (FAST) in an elderly population living in the community, and in patients with a first stroke. Fifty-one elderly people aged 69-90 years were screened. Ten subjects failed the test (score < 25/30). There was an inverse relationship between age and the FAST score (r s = -0.35, p = 0.02, 95% Cl 0.09-0.57). I n a group of 82 elderly patients, mean age 80 (6 years), admitted with a first stroke, the FAST was applied at one and seven days and the result compared with a clinical assessment and a speech therapy assessment. At day one 28 patients failed the test due to a reduced level of consciousness. The use of the FAST increased the sensitivity of screening from 87% to 96%, but reduced its specificity from 100% to 61 %. The positive and negative predictive values were 65% and 95% respectively.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 4, No. 2, 123-128 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559000400205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement