This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Moffett, J. K. Articles by Griffiths, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Moffett, J. K. Articles by Griffiths, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An investigation of the effects of cervical traction

Part 2: The effects on the neck musculature

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford

GI Hughes

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford

P. Griffiths

Oxford University Computing Service

Mechanical cervical traction is often used on the assumption that it reduces muscle tension.^1-5 The first 52 patients, included in a larger clinical trial of 100 patients with neck and arm pain described elsewhere⁶ who had been randomly allocated to weighted or placebo traction, had surface electromyography (EMG) recordings taken over the upper trapezius muscle. Results were based on 44 sets of useable data, and showed that both forms of traction (weighted and placebo) significantly reduced muscle tension when patients were reclining (p<0.05). This reduction was not maintained when the patient returned to an upright position. No significant differences in EMG reductions were found between placebo and weighted traction.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 4, No. 4, 287-290 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559000400406


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?