SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sackley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sackley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The verbal administration of the gross function scale of the Rivermead Motor Assessment

CM Sackley

General Hospital, Nottingham

NB Lincoln

General Hospital, Nottingham

The Rivermead Motor Assessment is a standardized assessment of physical recovery after stroke. One part, the gross function scale, was tested to see if it was reliable if administered verbally. Forty-nine volunteers were recruited six months after a stroke and asked to rate their own ability verbally and perform the test items with an independent assessor. There was a significant level of agreement between the scores using the Spearman Rank Correlation (rs = 0.979; p < 0.001). It can be concluded that the gross function scale of the Rivermead Motor Assessment is reliable when administered verbally with patients late after stroke.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 4, No. 4, 301-303 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559000400409


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. F. Tyson, M. Hanley, J. Chillala, A. B. Selley, and R. C. Tallis
The Relationship Between Balance, Disability, and Recovery After Stroke: Predictive Validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 341 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S F Tyson
The support taken through walking aids during hemiplegic gait
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1998; 12(5): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Adams, A. Ashburn, R. Pickering, and D. Taylor
The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in acute stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1997; 11(1): 42 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement