SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geddes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonsall, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Geddes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonsall, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Leeds Family Placement Scheme: principles, participants and postscript

Jml Geddes

Rheumatism and Rehabilitation Unit, University of Leeds

MA Chamberlain

Rheumatism and Rehabilitation Unit, University of Leeds

M. Bonsall

Rheumatism and Rehabilitation Unit, University of Leeds

A follow-up survey to measure functional ability was carried out on a group of patients with acute stroke who had received community-based rehabilitation from the Leeds Family Placement Scheme for stroke patients (FPS). A previous study at one year poststroke showed that patients receiving this additional support - placed patients (n = 10) - were more likely to maintain their three- month poststroke functional ability than were patients discharged directly home (n = 61). The follow-up contacted all survivors who were living in the community at 42 months poststroke. The proportion of patients who had maintained or improved their three-month poststroke Barthel score was statistically significantly greater in the group of placed patients (n = 8) than in the group of unplaced patients (n = 48). This paper describes the principles of the FPS, which provides patient-oriented, community-based rehabilitation, and suggests that its success in producing sustained and measurable improvement in functional ability may be largely due to the opportunity it provides for consolidating skills that have been learnt during hospital-based rehabilitation and in transferring these skills to the home.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 5, No. 1, 53-64 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559100500109


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. M. Geddes and M A. Chamberlain
Outcome evaluation: Outcome of stroke rehabilitation - observing current practice: a prerequisite for targets and standards
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 1992; 6(3): 253 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement