Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Knee extension power, velocity and torque: relative deficits and relation to walking performance in stroke patients

Richard W Bohannon

School of Allied Health, University of Connecticut and Department of Rehabilitation, Hartford Hospital

This study of hemiparetic stroke patients aimed to determine the nature and usefulness of dynamometer measurements of knee extension power compared to knee extension velocity and torque. Twenty subjects (mean age 63.7 years, time since stroke 70 days) performed maximum knee extension efforts on a Lido dynamometer. Specifically measured on each side were power and velocity during maximum velocity efforts and peak torque during isometric efforts. Subjects were timed while walking 7m at their 'most comfortable' and 'maximum safe' speeds. The mean knee extension performance deficits on the paretic side, compared to the nonparetic side, were 58.4% for power, 30.0% for velocity, and 44.5% for torque. The deficits were significantly different from one another. All muscle performance measures were correlated significantly with the gait speed measurements (paretic side r = 0.633-0.752; nonparetic side r = 0.448-0.650). Power measures were not clearly superior to velocity or torque measures for explaining gait speed. Measures of the paretic side, however, were superior to measures of the nonparetic side for predicting gait speed.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 6, No. 2, 125-131 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559200600206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
P. S Pohl, J. K Startzell, P. W Duncan, and D. Wallace
Reliability of lower extremity isokinetic strength testing in adults with stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2000; 14(6): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement