SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blomberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tibblin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blomberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tibblin, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A controlled, multicentre trial of manual therapy with steroid injections in low-back pain: functional variables, side effects and complications during four months follow-up

S. Blomberg

Department of Family Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala and The Skönvik Rehabilitation Clinic, Säter, Sweden

G. Tibblin

Department of Family Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala and The Skönvik Rehabilitation Clinic, Säter, Sweden

Outpatients with acute or subacute low-back pain were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. One group (n = 53) was given standardized but optimized conventional activating treatment by primary health care teams. The other group (n = 48) received specific manual treatment such as manipulation, specific mobilization, muscle stretching, autotraction and cortisone injections. There were significant differences on 15 disability rating scores and complaints in everyday life due to low-back problems in favour of the group receiving manual treatment, indicating that this treatment was superior to conventional treatment. The patients given manual treatment had a more positive view of treatment than those in the conventionally treated group. The experimental treatment was more painful than the conventional treatment, due to injections and muscle stretching. Only a few patients experienced manipulation and specific mobilization as painful. No persisting deterioration or complications were reported due to the experimental treatment.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 7, No. 1, 49-62 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559300700108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. J.J. Assendelft, S. C. Morton, E. I. Yu, M. J. Suttorp, and P. G. Shekelle
Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Low Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness Relative to Other Therapies
Ann Intern Med, June 3, 2003; 138(11): 871 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement