Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Methodological difificulties in rehabilitation research

C. Pollock

School of Public Health, University of Leeds

N. Freemantle

School of Public Health, University of Leeds

T. Sheldon

School of Public Health, University of Leeds

F. Song

School of Public Health, University of Leeds

JM Mason

Centre for Health Economics, University of York

This paper presents an overview of some of the pitfalls and suggests ways of improving the quality of research into rehabilitation after stroke. The aims of rehabilitation are outlined and methodological problems inherent in this area discussed, including spontaneous recovery, multidimensional outcomes, definition of treatment and placebo effects. Major weaknesses found in the rehabilitation literature are identified and recommendations for improvement made, including the need for comparable controls, adequate numbers, appropriate outcome measures, clear definition of therapy, generalizability, and a concern for the cost-effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation packages. The field of rehabilitation is still relatively new and idiosyncratic in form and content. Thus it still provides opportunities for research into its relative effectiveness before current practices in rehabilitation become entrenched in medical practice and folklore. Adequate funding support for improved, multicentre clinical trials in rehabilitation is essential.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 7, No. 1, 63-72 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559300700109


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
V. M. Pomeroy, E. Cooke, S. Hamilton, A. Whittet, and R. C. Tallis
Development of a Schedule of Current Physiotherapy Treatment Used to Improve Movement Control and Functional Use of the Lower Limb after Stroke: A Precursor to a Clinical Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 350 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement