This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McPherson, K. Articles by Dowell, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McPherson, K. Articles by Dowell, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Validation studies of the OPCS scale — more useful than the Barthel Index?

Rehabilitation Medicine Unit and Vehicles (For the Disabled) Centre, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh

RL Sloan

Rehabilitation Medicine Unit and Vehicles (For the Disabled) Centre, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh

J. Hunter

Rehabilitation Medicine Unit and Vehicles (For the Disabled) Centre, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh

CM Dowell

Rehabilitation Medicine Unit and Vehicles (For the Disabled) Centre, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh

The OPCS scales of disability were developed as a survey tool to estimate the prevalence of disability amongst adults in the UK. This study evaluates the use of the OPCS scales in a clinical setting. A total of 265 patients attending a rehabilitation unit and wheelchair centre were assessed. The OPCS scales were validated against the standard Barthel Index and sensitivity to change over time was examined. An inter-rater reliability study was also performed. The results showed good correlation between the OPCS scales and Barthel Index (0.82, p < 0.001, n = 265) and it was shown that the OPCS scales were sensitive to clinical change over a six-month period. Inter-rater reliability was also good (0.96, p < 0.001, n = 120). The 95% confidence limits were also examined. The 'ceiling' effect of the Barthel Index is not found in the OPCS scales of disability. The results of the study support further use of the OPCS scales and suggest that it has a place in the assessment of rehabilitation outcome.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 7, No. 2, 105-112 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559300700203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M Yohannes and M. J Connolly Early mobilization with walking aids following hospital admission with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2003; 17(5): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B S Panesar, P Morrison, and J Hunter A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2001; 15(2): 157 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Kersten, M. A Mullee, J. A. Smith, L. McLellan, and S. George Generic health status measures are unsuitable for measuring health status in severely disabled people Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1999; 13(3): 219 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Kavanagh and M. Knapp The impact on general practitioners of the changing balance of care for elderly people living in institutions BMJ, August 1, 1998; 317(7154): 322 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text]