SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, K. N
Right arrow Articles by Mulley, G. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davies, K. N
Right arrow Articles by Mulley, G. P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The views of elderly people on emergency alarm use

Keren N Davies

Department of Medicine for the Elderly, St James's University Hospital, Leeds — Dept of Health Care for the Elderly, The Royal London Hospital (Mile End), Bancroft Rd, London E1 4DG, UK

Graham P Mulley

Department of Medicine for the Elderly, St James's University Hospital, Leeds

A survey of residents living in local authority (LA) and private housing association (PHA) sheltered accommodation was undertaken to examine and compare the frequency of use and acceptability of the installed alarm system. The majority (80%) of residents had been taught how to use their alarm by the resident warden, but only 35% had received any information on when to use the alarm. In a perceived emergency, 19 (20%) residents did not use the alarm to summon assistance. When the alarm was used, 94% of residents received help within 10 minutes of the call. Over one-third of those questioned had never used their alarm. None of the patients supplied with a portable trigger wore it, either because it was perceived as too sensitive or the appearance was deemed unattractive. Nonetheless, most of the residents (81 %) felt that the alarms were useful and provided reassurance. There should be greater selectivity in the alloca tion of alarms, more education of alarm users to improve the usefulness of these systems, and better design of portable triggers to make them more acceptable to the wearers.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 7, No. 4, 278-282 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559300700402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement