SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powell, G. E
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Powell, G. E
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, S. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Recovery curves for patients who have suffered very severe brain injury

Graham E Powell

Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford

Sarah L Wilson

Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford

Twenty-nine patients were admitted to a study of recovery of function following very severe brain injury and contributed detailed information towards the plotting of recovery curves. The patients were followed up longitudinally for periods of up to one year two months, and comprised three cohorts: those entering the study zero to 12 months, 13-24 months and 25 plus months post injury. Every two weeks, nurses completed a structured observation schedule containing 13 scales. Also every two weeks, patients were directly observed using a time sampling technique with 12 categories of behaviour. Recovery upon entry into the study was steeper in the first three months and then slowed, but did not asymptote in the period of observation, and recovery was best for those in the zero to 12 months post injury group. An overall recovery curve from the time of injury was plotted, which showed a steeper rise in the first year, but recovery clearly continued for three or four years. Marked individual differences were noted. Most recovery related to attempts to communicate, general alertness, motor control and more normalized mood. Implications for treatment are discussed.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 54-69 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement