SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pound, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pound, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patients' satisfaction with stroke services

Pandora Pound

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London

Patrick Gompertz

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London

Shah Ebrahim

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London

Patient satisfaction with stroke services is a key aspect of the evaluation of the quality of services but there are no adequate means of assessing satisfaction in this area. A questionnaire derived from in-depth interviews was piloted on two samples. The resulting questionnaire consisted of two sections, one on inpatient services (Hospsat) and the other on services in the community (Homesat). It was sent to 219 patients, who had had a stroke six months previously, along with postal versions of the Barthel ADL index, the Nottingham Extended ADL Scale, the Nottingham Health Profile, the short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale and the Faces Scale. The response rate for the questionnaires was 87%.

Test-retest reliability and tests of internal consistency of the satisfaction scales were carried out on a subsample of this population. Convergent and discriminant validity were explored by examining correlations with the above measures.

The satisfaction questionnaire had construct validity with significant correla tions between the Barthel ADL Index (r = 0.39), the Nottingham Extended ADL Scale (r= 0.38) and the physical mobility subsection of the Nottingham Health Profile (r= -0.36). Internal consistency was high for both sections (Cronbach's Alpha: Hospsat 0.86; Homesat 0.77). Test-retest reliability was fair; the mean difference for total scores was 0.59 (SD = 2.4) for Hospsat, and 0.32 (SD = 2.1) for Homesat.

A high level of dissatisfaction was uncovered. Just under half (48%) of people were dissatisfied with some aspect of the care they received in hospital and over half (53%) were dissatisfied with some aspect of the services they received in the community. The highest rate (54%) of dissatisfaction was with the amount of therapy received.

Good patient satisfaction measures are useful since they complement 'objective' outcome measures and may highlight areas in need of evaluation and improvement.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 7-17 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Murray, J. Young, and A. Forster
Measuring outcomes in the longer term after a stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2009; 23(10): 918 - 921.
[PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
A. Forster, J. Young, J. Green, C. Patterson, P. Wanklyn, J. Smith, J. Murray, H. Wild, S. Bogle, and K. Lowson
Structured re-assessment system at 6 months after a disabling stroke: a randomised controlled trial with resource use and cost study
Age Ageing, September 1, 2009; 38(5): 576 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Smith, A. Forster, J. Young, and On behalf of the Cochrane Group for information pr
Cochrane review: information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 195 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. A. McManus, A. Craig, C. McAlpine, P. Langhorne, and G. Ellis
Does behaviour modification affect post-stroke risk factor control? Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 99 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. Mangset, Tor Erling Dahl, R. Forde, and T. B. Wyller
'We're just sick people, nothing else': ... factors contributing to elderly stroke patients' satisfaction with rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 825 - 835.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Corr and A. Bayer
Occupational therapy for stroke patients after hospital discharge -- a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1995; 9(4): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
P. Gompertz, P. Pound, and S. Ebrahim
Validity of the extended activities of daily living scale
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1994; 8(4): 275 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement