SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geddes, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Geddes, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, M A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Improving social outcome after stroke: an evaluation of the volunteer stroke scheme

Joanna ML Geddes

The University of Leeds, Leeds

M Anne Chamberlain

The University of Leeds, Leeds

Data were obtained on all referrals of stroke patients to the speech therapy departments of two adjoining Health Authorities, Leeds West and Leeds East. Only Leeds West had a Volunteer Stroke Scheme (VSS) available. Qualified speech and language therapists in both Health Authorities classified patients as dysphasic and/or dysarthric and identified those they thought likely to benefit from support from the VSS. From these latter patients, three groups were identified: Leeds West patients receiving support from the VSS (n = 34); Leeds West patients who refused VSS support (n = 9); and Leeds East patients with no VSS support available (n = 10).

All patients were followed up for one year and changes in Barthel Index, Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) and carers' Hospital Anxiety and Depression scores were recorded. Only those patients who received VSS support demonstrated a statistically significant increase in FAI over the year.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 2, 116-126 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H C Dijkerman, M Ietswaart, M Johnston, and R S MacWalter
Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2004; 18(5): 538 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. E. Andersen, K. Eriksen, A. Brown, K. Schultz-Larsen, and B. H. Forchhammer
Follow-up services for stroke survivors after hospital discharge-a randomized control study
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 593 - 603.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. T Newall, V. A Wood, R. L. Hewer, and D. J Tinson
Development of a neurological rehabilitation environment: an observational study
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1997; 11(2): 146 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Marshall and C. Sacchett
Does the Volunteer Stroke Scheme improve social outcome after stroke? A response to Geddes and Chamberlain
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1996; 10(2): 104 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement