This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gompertz, P. Articles by Ebrahim, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gompertz, P. Articles by Ebrahim, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A postal version of the Barthel Index

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London

Pandora Pound

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London

Shah Ebrahim

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London

The Barthel Index is the best known and most popular activities of daily living (ADL) scale. Many studies have confirmed its validity and it has been validated for many different methods of administration. These include direct observation, interview of patient carer or nurse and telephone. The aim of this study was to devise and test the reliability of a self-completed postal version of the Barthel Index for use in surveys and outcome studies.

The items were changed into multiple choice questions, taking into account the published guidelines and knowledge of common areas of confusion when administering the Barthel by interview. The test retest reliability over two weeks of the resulting questionnaire was evaluated using a consecutive series of 21 patients from a stroke register, who had responded without prompting to a postal survey six months after stroke. All the items had statistics indicating at least moderate reliability, the toilet and mobility items being the worst. The mean difference in total scores was -0.5 out of 20, standard deviation 2.1. The 95% limits of agreement were -4.6 to 3.6, corresponding to a change in dependence of up to two ADL items. This study demonstrates that the postal self-report questionnaire version of the Barthel is reliable and practical. Further studies are needed to establish its validity in comparison with interview administration.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 3, 233-239 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800308


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Hurn, I. Kneebone, and M. Cropley Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2006; 20(9): 756 - 772. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S Banerjee, S C Smith, D L Lamping, R H Harwood, B Foley, P Smith, J Murray, M Prince, E Levin, A Mann, et al. Quality of life in dementia: more than just cognition. An analysis of associations with quality of life in dementia J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2006; 77(2): 146 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Hobart, A. Riazi, A. J. Thompson, I. M. Styles, W. Ingram, P. J. Vickery, M. Warner, P. J. Fox, and J. P. Zajicek Getting the measure of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: the Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88) Brain, January 1, 2006; 129(1): 224 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C Miller, M. Speechley, and A B. Deathe Balance Confidence Among People With Lower-Limb Amputations Physical Therapy, September 1, 2002; 82(9): 856 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. O'Hara, H. Cadbury, L. De Souza, and L. Ide Evaluation of the effectiveness of professionally guided self-care for people with multiple sclerosis living in the community: A randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2002; 16(2): 119 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Gibson and A. Frank Supporting individuals with disabling multiple sclerosis J R Soc Med, January 12, 2002; 95(12): 580 - 586. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Bent, A Jones, I Molloy, M A Chamberlain, and A Tennant Factors determining participation in young adults with a physical disability: a pilot study Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2001; 15(5): 552 - 561. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hobart, D. Lamping, R. Fitzpatrick, A. Riazi, and A. Thompson The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measure Brain, May 1, 2001; 124(5): 962 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L van der Dussen, W Nieuwstraten, M Roebroeck, and H J Stam Functional level of young adults with cerebral palsy Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 84 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J J M F van der Putten, J C Hobart, J A Freeman, and A J Thompson Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 1999; 66(4): 480 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. Hachisuka, H. Ogata, H. Ohkuma, S. Tanaka, and K. Dozono Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1997; 11(1): 28 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]