SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. I
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. I
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A comparison of neuropsychological and functional outcome, and uptake of rehabilitation services, following severe and moderate head injury

Shirley I Anderson

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

Robert Taylor

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

Patricia A Jones

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

J Douglas Miller

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh

We undertook a prospective outcome study of 61 patients with head injuries of differing severities who had been admitted to a neurosurgical unit and who survived for six months or more. Patients and relatives were interviewed and patients were neuropsychologically assessed six months from the time of injury. Details of the uptake of rehabilitation services were also collected. Three- quarters of the patients with severe head injury and two-thirds of those with moderate head injury remained severely or moderately disabled at follow-up. Both groups showed evidence of cognitive impairment and were reported by relatives to be suffering emotional and psychological problems. Whereas 54% of the severely head injured received inpatient rehabilitation, this was true of only 23% of those with moderate head injury.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 301-306 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. J Hellawell, R. Taylor, and B. Pentland
Persisting symptoms and carers' views of outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 1999; 13(4): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement