SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ham, R.
Right arrow Articles by Van de Ven, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ham, R.
Right arrow Articles by Van de Ven, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patterns of recovery for lower limb amputation

Rosalind Ham

King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry

June de Trafford

King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry

Catherine Van de Ven

Richmond, Tvvickenham and Roehampton Health Authority, Queen Mary University Hospital, London

Following the identification of functional activities to record the recovery patterns of the amputee, a preliminary survey was carried out over a 12-month period, to monitor these patterns following lower limb amputation. Four hundred and fifty-nine returns were received and the profile of the sample was found to be in line with the UK amputee data.

The results show that basic bed activities that is, moving about the bed, moving from the lying to sitting position and being able to sit up unaided, were the easiest activities for the sample to achieve independently and took between one to two weeks. Transferring the upper body and dressing the upper body independently were more difficult and took between three to four weeks to achieve and dressing the lower body took, on average, three to five weeks to master following the amputation.

A number of the patients were either transferred or discharged from the site of the operation from the second week postoperatively and were not followed up by the physiotherapists at the acute site. This resulted in the data on the later milestones of recovery, either using an early walking aid or a prosthesis, being less accurate. A further study that takes these facts into account is recommended to conclusively establish the milestones of recovery for this group of disabled patients.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 320-328 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800408


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement