SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carr, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carr, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kenney, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Observing seated posture after stroke: a reliability study

EK Carr

Department of Nursing Studies, King's College London, London

FD Kenney

Physiotherapy Group, Normanby College, King's College London, London

Encouraging patients to adopt 'reflex inhibiting' postures after a stroke has long been thought to enhance their recovery. However, the efficacy of this rehabilitative strategy has never been evaluated. The development of a simple, reliable means of recording information about resting posture is prerequisite to the design of such an evaluative study. This paper describes the preliminary findings of a study designed to test the reliability of such a method. Using a simple observational tool, two observers made simultaneous observations of each of 20 aspects of the posture of a sample of 13 seated stroke patients. Each patient was observed up to five times, such that a total of 50 pairs of observations were made for each aspect of posture. For 18 (90%) of the aspects of posture the coefficients of agreement were satisfactory. While further testing using other positions is required, the results suggest that the tool has the potential for use in future research.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 329-333 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800409


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E K Carr, F D Kenney, J Wilson-Barnett, and D J Newham
Inter-rater reliability of postural observation after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1999; 13(3): 229 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement