SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brejc, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brejc, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluational and counselling interventions provided by a vocational rehabilitation unit

Tone Brejc

Ljubljana University Rehabilitation Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia

The objective of this exploratory investigation was to evaluate the benefits of evaluation and counselling interventions provided by the Vocational Rehabilitation Unit of Ljubljana University Rehabilitation Institute. Relative benefits ratio/quotient (RBQ), i.e. the ratio between gains in economic independence, social integration and subjective satisfaction of the client, degree of case difficulty, and amount of programme provided by the Unit were obtained for 75 clients.

No relationship existed between the benefits resulting from the Unit interventions, degree of difficulty of client problems (case difficulty), and the amount of programme. The findings supported the idea that intensive rehabilitation efforts did not have a linear and immediate influence on the results. The clients achieved greater economical and social than personal benefits, while their dissatisfaction with nonvocational consequences of the programme, especially those related to the narrowing social interactions was also obvious.

The relative benefits ratio, developed for this investigation, proved to be a fairly simple and practical tool for the assessment of rehabilitation work. However, it requires further improvement by establishing reliability and validity of the assessment criteria, and defining relative importance of the case difficulty indicators.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 8, No. 4, 346-352 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559400800412


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement