SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keren, O.
Right arrow Articles by Groswasser, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keren, O.
Right arrow Articles by Groswasser, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Dynamic changes in upper limb short latency somatosensory-evoked potentials following stroke in the dominant hemisphere

O. Keren

Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv

H. Ring

Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv

H. Pratt

Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Technion, Haifa

Z. Groswasser

Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv

Repeated upper limb short latency somatosensory-evoked potential (USSEP) studies were performed in 19 post-stroke patients and correlated with the clinical evaluation. Examinations were performed on admission to the rehabilitation centre, and again about 10 weeks later. Data analysis focused on the temporal changes occurring in each patient, and the relationship of these changes to the patient's clinical condition. In seven of the 19 patients, no cortical potentials could be detected on admission or follow-up. These patients had the worst clinical outcome. Whenever a cortical potential was found in the first examination, it was also detected in the second. Dynamic changes between examinations were mainly seen in the central conduction time (CCT) and showed an opposite trend in each hemisphere. In the second examination, the average CCT lengthened over the damaged hemisphere (p < 0.03) but shortened (insignificantly) over the nonaffected hemisphere, relative to the CCT in the first test. A positive correlation (p < 0.03) was found between the increase in NI/PI amplitude - measured peak-to-peak between the major negative component (NI) of the cortical response and the subsequent positive wave (PI)-and improvement in communication ability, especially comprehension.

The USSEP can serve as an auxiliary tool in monitoring the recovery process of stroke patients. Changes in USSEP components occur over both hemispheres and may serve as markers of brain plasticity.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 52-60 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559500900108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement