SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Articles by Unsworth, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Articles by Unsworth, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prescribing wheelchairs: the opinions of wheelchair users and their carers

Caroline Smith

CASPE Research, London

Michele McCreadie

Regional Rehabilitation Centre, Southern Birmingham Community Health Trust, Birmingham

Jim Unsworth

Regional Rehabilitation Centre, Southern Birmingham Community Health Trust, Birmingham

The first stage in the process of developing an audit tool for wheelchair services was a study to examine the expectations of wheelchair users and their carers. The findings demonstrate an expectation that the wheelchair will improve their quality of life, enable them to maintain or attain a level of mobility, and help the user to achieve an acceptable level of independence. Wheelchair users also required a wheelchair that was comfortable, easy to propel, that had an acceptable appearance and was safe. For the carer/attendant the main requirements were for a chair that was easy to push and lightweight for lifting. They also hoped that the wheelchair would improve the quality of both their life and that of the user, and improve or maintain their health status. The results also suggest that information on carers may not be routinely collected during assessment, and that there is a need to formalize a sensitive approach to assessing the expectations of users and their carers. The authors conclude that a correctly prescribed wheelchair benefits both user and carer.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 74-80 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559500900112


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R Hansen, S Tresse, and R K Gunnarsson
Fewer accidents and better maintenance with active wheelchair check-ups: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 631 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A O Frank, J Ward, N J Orwell, C Mccullagh, and M Belcher
Introduction of a new NHS electric-powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC) service: benefits, risks and implications for prescribers
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2000; 14(6): 665 - 673.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement