Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bakheit, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 2, 142-149 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559500900209

Delivery of rehabilitation services — an integrated hospital-community model

Amo Bakheit

Department of Rehabilitation, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth

The present models of delivery of rehabilitation services in the United Kingdom do not take into account the recent reorganization of the National Health Service (NHS) into purchaser and provider units, or the Community Care Act. Furthermore, these models are based almost entirely on hospital practice with minimal emphasis on long-term community support for the disabled.

An alternative model, which takes into account the recent changes in planning and resource allocation in the NHS, and the new role of local government in community care provision for people with disabilities, is proposed in this paper. The model also attempts to bridge the gap between hospital and community rehabilitation services. It is based on a philosophy of multidisciplinary team work, clients' autonomy and recognition of the contribution and needs of informal carers. It emphasises the importance of creating a partnership with local authorities and voluntary bodies which care for the disabled.

To ensure the continuity of rehabilitation care provision in the community, the model adopts a system of follow-up which is based on three levels of assessment of the needs of disabled clients living in the community. It is suggested that disabled clients with high care needs, e.g. disabled school leavers, are reviewed routinely by the rehabilitation physician. Subjects with mild or stable disability and adequate social support may only need to be reviewed on ad hoc basis, whilst those with intermediate needs could be monitored by a therapist by telephone or home visits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?