Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kidd, D.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kidd, D.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The benefit of inpatient neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis

D. Kidd

The National Hospitals for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London

RS Howard

The National Hospitals for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London

NA Losseff

The National Hospitals for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London

AJ Thompson

The National Hospitals for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London

The role of an inpatient neurorehabilitation unit in the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unclear. A necessary first step is the demonstration of benefit in those who are admitted. In order to address this question, 79 patients with MS admitted over a 16-month period for multidisciplinary rehabilitation were studied using assessment scales as measures of disability and handicap. Fourteen patients were recovering from a recent relapse and the remaining 65 were in the progressive phase of the disease. The patients were clinically assessed and rated on admission and discharge using Kurtzke's Disability Status Scale (DSS), the Barthel Index (BI) and the Environmental Status Scale (ESS). A statistically significant functional improvement was seen in 65% of patients as determined by the Barthel Index and 44% improved on the ESS. Improvement was most marked in those in whom a reduction in impairment had occurred during recovery from relapse but also occurred in 63% of those who had not changed neurologically. These results suggest a beneficial effect from admission to a neurorehabilitation unit for patients with MS, including those in the progressive phase of the disease, although its role in the long-term management of MS remains to be defined.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 9, No. 3, 198-203 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026921559500900304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
V. de Groot, H. Beckerman, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, H. C. W. de Vet, G. J. Lankhorst, C. H. Polman, and L. M. Bouter
The usefulness of evaluative outcome measures in patients with multiple sclerosis
Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2648 - 2659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
L K Storr, P S Sorensen, and M Ravnborg
The efficacy of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in stable multiple sclerosis patients
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2006; 12(2): 235 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
D W Langdon and A J Thompson
Multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study of selected variables affecting rehabilitation outcome
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 1999; 5(2): 94 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J J M F van der Putten, J C Hobart, J A Freeman, and A J Thompson
Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 1999; 66(4): 480 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. A. Freeman, D. W. Langdon, J. C. Hobart, and A. J. Thompson
Inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Do the benefits carry over into the community?
Neurology, January 1, 1999; 52(1): 50 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. K. Ko
Effectiveness of rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1999; 13(1_suppl): 33 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J Sitzia, V Haddrell, and M Rice-Oxley
Evaluation of a nurse-led multidisciplinary neurological rehabilitation programme using the Nottingham Health Profile
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 1998; 12(5): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
K. Fuller, K. Dawson, and C. Wiles
Physiotherapy in chronic multiple sclerosis: a controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 1996; 10(3): 195 - 204.
[PDF]



Advertisement